Document Type : Original Research Article

Authors

Saint James School of Medicine, Anguilla, British West Indies.

Abstract

Background: Cigarette smoke predisposes a person to a lot of preventable diseases; this study aimed at comparing Lung Function in active, previous and non-smokers in students using the ratio of Forced Vital Capacity, to Forced Expiratory Volume measurement in one second called the Tiffeneau-Pinelli Index.
Materials and Methods: A cross-section of 77 students from the St. James School of Medicine, Anguilla campus in the Caribbean who are active smokers, previous smokers or non-smokers were randomly sampled with consent using questionnaire based study and measurement of Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ratio was done.
Results: The results showed that the mean FEV/FVC ratio for Smokers was lower than that for non-smokers and Ex-smokers in both test 1 and 2. The FEV/FVC ratio by sex was higher in females for both test 1 and 2. There were significant differences among the races with Caucasians having the lowest mean value of 86.04 and 85.88 for test 1 and 2 respectively. Higher ratio of more than 0.7 for smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers was recorded for mean FEV/FVC ratio.

Graphical Abstract

The Effect of Cigarette Smoking on Lung Capacity in Active, Previous, and Passive Student Smokers

Keywords

[1] Müller T, Hengstermann A. Nrf2: Friend and foe in preventing cigarette smoking-dependent lung disease. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012; 25 (9), 1805-24. [DOI:10.1021/tx300145n] [PMID]

[2] US Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking-50 years of progress: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health. 2014 27;17.https://aahb.org/Resources/Pictures/ Meetings/2014Charleston/PPT%20Presentations/Sunday%20 Welcome/Abrams.AAHB.3.13.v1.o.pdf

[3] Satcher D, Thompson TG, Koplan JP. Women and smoking: A report of the Surgeon General. Nicotine & Tobacco Res. 2002; 4(1):07-20. [DOI:10.1080/14622200210135650] [PMID]

[4] Stevenson CS, Belvisi MG. Preclinical animal models of asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Expert. Rev. of. Resp. Med. 2008; 2(5):631-43. [DOI:10.1586/17476348.2.5.631] [PMID]

[5] Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care. Med. 1995; 152(3):1107-36. [DOI:10.1164/ajrccm.152.3.7663792] [PMID]

[6] Barreiro TJ, Perillo I. An approach to interpreting spirometry. Am. Fam. Physician. 2004; 69(5):1107-16.

[7] Chiappa S, Winn J, Viñuela A, Tipney H, Spector TD. A probabilistic model of biological ageing of the lungs for analysing the effects of smoking, asthma and COPD. Resp. Rres. 2013; 14(1):60. [DOI:10.1186/1465-9921-14-60] [PMID] [PMCID]

[8] Stanojevic S, Wade A, Stocks J, Hankinson J, Coates AL, Pan H, et al. Reference ranges for spirometry across all ages: a new approach. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care. Med. 2008; 177(3):253-60. [DOI:10.1164/ rccm.200708-1248OC] [PMID] [PMCID]

[9] Agaku IT, King BA, Dube SR. Current cigarette smoking among adults-United States, 2005-2012. MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2014; 63(2):29-34. [PubMed]

[10] Valavanidis A, Vlachogianni T, Fiotakis K. Tobacco smoke: Involvement of reactive oxygen species and stable free radicals in mechanisms of oxidative damage, carcinogenesis and synergistic effects with other respirable particles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2009, 6(2), 445-62. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph6020445] [PMID] [PMCID]